Eastway Tank lodges $14.4 million lawsuit in opposition to insurer

Article content material

Eastway Tank, Pump and Meter is suing its insurance coverage dealer for $14.4 million, alleging “negligence and breach of contract” that left the corporate “underinsured” on the time of the explosion that killed six individuals on Jan. 13, 2022.

Legal professionals for Eastway filed the lawsuit on Jan. 11 in opposition to native insurer Gifford Carr Insurance coverage Brokers, claiming the tanker truck producer has incurred $12.9 million in enterprise revenue underinsurance losses within the two years for the reason that explosion.

Article content material

Article content material

The blast killed six workers in one of many worst office incidents within the province within the final 50 years.

Eastway and its president, Neil Greene, are set to face trial in March on expenses laid beneath Ontario’s Occupational Well being and Security Act, alleging the corporate did not take ample precautions through the testing of vans at its Merivale Highway facility.

In accordance with Eastway’s civil lawsuit, Gifford Carr acted as Eastway’s insurance coverage dealer for greater than 20 years and the corporate had been engaged in annual coverage renewal discussions with an agent within the months previous to the explosion.

Greene met with the agent, Kevin O’Donoghue, in December 2021, however the course of was not accomplished by the annual renewal date of Dec. 25, 2021, court docket paperwork state.

In accordance with the lawsuit, the coverage renewal paperwork solely arrived by electronic mail on Jan. 14, 2022 — the day after the explosion.

“This course of was late and delayed attributable to a scarcity of consideration and diligence on the a part of (the agent) who supplied assurances to Eastway that he would attend to its insurance coverage wants and that the coverage could be renewed,” the lawsuit alleges.

Article content material

No assertion of defence has been filed on behalf of Gifford Carr or O’Donoghue and the allegations contained within the lawsuit haven’t been examined in court docket.

“We don’t have any remark or assertion right now and can respect the continuing authorized proceedings,” mentioned firm president Matthew Carr in a press release this week.

“I too haven’t any remark,” O’Donoghue wrote in an electronic mail.

In accordance with the lawsuit, the Jan. 14 electronic mail and the hooked up cowl letter, which confirmed the coverage renewal and outlined premium prices, was “not well timed or of any utility to Eastway, as a result of it was not delivered in an affordable timeframe earlier than renewal.

“Actually, the letter was delivered by electronic mail on the day after the (explosion), at a time when the buildings on the Eastway yard had been broken past restore and in want of rebuilding and alternative.”

The lawsuit additional claims that the chance had already handed for Gifford to warn Eastway concerning the “pervasive and significant issue” of underinsurance for industrial properties. It additionally alleges that O’Donoghue “knew that underinsurance is a pervasive and significant issue for industrial property house owners, leaving them weak to soak up massive financial losses,” and made no effort to warn Eastway till after the explosion.

Article content material

The assertion of declare was lodged almost two years after the explosion that killed six employees: Matthew Kearney, 36, a service supervisor and calibration technician; electrician and airplane engineer Etienne Mabiala, 59; welder Kayla Ferguson, 26; electrician Danny Beale, 29; mechanic and welder Rick Bastien, 57; and Russel McLellan, 43, Eastway’s plant supervisor. A seventh employee pulled from the fireplace by coworkers suffered severe burns.

The Ministry of Labour filed expenses close to the one-year anniversary of the blast, alleging Eastway Tank and Greene did not take cheap precautions within the office through the “moist testing” of tanker vans.

The moist take a look at of a gasoline tanker is used to find out the amount of liquid it could actually carry and is often carried out earlier than a tanker is put into service.

The ministry alleges Eastway and Greene did not take cheap precautions by, amongst different issues, guaranteeing that the diesel gasoline for use within the moist take a look at was not contaminated with gasoline or some other flammable substance. It additionally alleges Greene and the corporate failed to make sure the truck tank was freed from gasoline or some other flammable substances, and that flammable vapours within the tank weren’t uncovered to a possible supply of ignition.

Article content material

The ministry additional alleges Eastway and Greene failed to supply ample instruction and supervision to employees on secure gasoline storage, and secure gasoline dealing with through the moist testing of vans.

The judge-alone trial is about for March 4 and is scheduled to take a seat till mid-June.

“Because the matter continues to be earlier than the court docket, it could be inappropriate for the ministry to supply additional remark,” the ministry acknowledged this week.

-With recordsdata from Andrew Duffy. 

[email protected]

Article content material